Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Managing the External Environment Assignment.

One of the most critical stakeholders in the construction is the government agencies, including OSHA. In this regard, there is a need to ensure that there is an inclusion of a proper management methodology (Loosemore, Danity, & Lingard, 2011). This, as such, may involve the analysis of a proper consultation framework. The agencies, nevertheless, will provide the guidelines for the implementation of the management framework. It is an inclusive approach that ensures that all contributions are taken into perspective. Managing the External Environment Assignment.

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The workers, moreover, will play a fundamental role in the management of the construction works. In this regard, there is a need to ensure a bottom-up approach that ensures that the opinions are implemented in the overall management framework. The workers, or a representative, will ensure that the company implements policies that are suitable for the working conditions and the construction environment (Kakitahi et al., 2016).

All the executives, including the CEO, will also be influential in the establishment of the framework. The management is mandated with the responsibility of ensuring that all guidelines are implemented, which essentially determines the safety of the working environment. Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Project Communication Strategy

The framework needs to consider both the bottom-up approach and the top-down approach if the implementation strategy is going to be successful (Lingard, 2017)l. In this regard, it is essential to ensure that there is upwaward communication from the workers. This ensures that the minute details of the construction safety are implemented into the management framework. The strategy, in this regard, is dependent on the perception of the workers.

On the other hand, a top-down approach is useful in ensuring that the policies of the company extend into the workers. This is more of a consultative approach that ensures that the management provides the side of the measures while the workers indicate their views (Asanka & Ranasinghe, 2015). The collaboration, in turn, ensures that all the necessities of the safety measures are understood and the opinion of all the workers is taken into consideration. However, there may be a need for a more direct approach by the OSHA personnel due to the gravity of the situation and the impacts on the general working environment. Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Risk

One of the significant dangers that may face the organization is the lack of devotion by the workers. In this regard,it is imperative to understand that worker engagement is one of the most vital issues when there is an implementation of safety measures around the workplace (Bhattacharjee, Ghosh, & Young-Corbett, 2010). In such regard, the lack of devotion may mean that there is a shortage in the implementation measures.’

Moreover, there is a risk that is inherent to the organization. In such regards, it is essential to understand that specific measures that are proposed by the OSHA framework may not fit well within the organization structure. This means that there is a shortage in coverage regarding the full implementation of the measures. Characteristics of the organization, such as the management structure, limit the possibility of a proper methodology in the implementation framework (Liberal, 2019). There may be various issues that may surround the decision making process that make the general process ineffective. It as such limits the compliance of the company to the framework that has been outlined by the regulating agencies. Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Issues

There is a possibility that the framework may become ineffective in the implementation stage. This means that there may be a misfit between the business structure and the OSHA framework, mainly due to the acquisition of one company by another. The limitation, as such, makes the general process ineffective and may lead to non-compliance. However., this is highly dependent on the management framework since it is the core of the decision making process of the organization. An incompatibility between the new acquisition and the framework that is in place makes the general process ineffective.

Figure 3: Context of Construction Work

Project Analysis

The Gantt Chart

The Chart needs to specify the role of each stakeholder in the general implementation process. The lack of the chart may lead to redundancy in some of the issues that face the organization and moreover, may lead to the use of unproportionate requirements.

In this regard, the Gantt chart of the organization is as follows:

The tasks, in this case, are dependent on the specifications of the management. There are varying requirements between one project and as such, each mission is dependent on the specification of the management and the framework that has been used to ensure inclusion of the different stakeholders.

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

The milestones

The milestones will dependent on the type of construction environment and the requirements outlined by the OSHA framework. In this regard, the first activity revolves around the identification of events that are present in the construction site. Secondly, there is a need to determine the hazards that may be present at the construction site. The dangers, in this regard, are dependent on the activities that have been identified. The risk assessment methodology focuses on the risks that have been identified in the project activities. Managing the External Environment Assignment. It is imperative to ensure that the framework takes into consideration the working environment and the safety of the workers. This also is essential in determining the protective and security measures that need to be implemented in the construction site. The rules, nevertheless, have to be continually reviewed, either on a monthly, weekly, or daily basis. The review, in this regard, tries to determine the effectiveness of the measures that have been implemented. An identification of the faults, in this regard, determines the periodic improvement of the measures that have been implemented.

Internal resource plan

The resource planning process is dependent on the understanding of the framework that has been outlined by the government. This means that the workforce and the planning personnel play a big role in the execution of the whole project.

External resource acquisition planning

This entails the inclusion of personnel from the external authorities who are well conversant with the regulatory measures that must be implemented in ensuring that all the principles of the OSHA framework are implemented. In such a regard, there is need to ensure that the following table is adhered to by the organizing committee.

Project Budget and Cashflow planning

The project needs to fall within an allowable budget. This means that there is a need to review the whole process and understand the essential details of the project. The budget, in this regard, depends on the market economics and the internal factors of the organization. Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Overview

The planning process may be the most intense in the whole project lifecycle. This means that there is a need to ensure that there is a consultative framework which will ensure that each stakeholder is involved in the decision making process. In such regard, the whole planning phase may take approximately two weeks.

One of the groups to be involved in the planning process are the workers and their representatives. The workers provide a benchmark from where the project indicates the necessities. OSHA representatives need to be included in order to ensure that the project is well in line with the framework. Finally, there is a need to ensure that management is involved. This is primarily because they are the decision-makers.

References

Asanka, W. A., & Ranasinghe, M. (2015). STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ACCIDENTS ON CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 6th international conference on civil engineering and construction management, (pp. 58-67).

Beach, T. H., Rana, O. F., Rezgui, Y., & Parashar, M. (2013). Cloud computing for the architecture, engineering and construction sector: requirements, prototype and experience. Journal of Cloud Computing, 2 (8). Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Bhardwaj, S., Jain, L., & Jain, S. (2010). Cloud computing: A study of infrastructure as a service (IAAS). International Journal of Engineering and Information Technology, 2 (1), 60-63.

Bhattacharjee, S., Ghosh, S., & Young-Corbett, D. (2010). Safety Improvement Approaches in Construction Industry: A Review and Future Directions. 47th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-8). Muncie, Indiana.

Blismas, N., & Wakefield, R. (2009). Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia. Construction Innovation , 9 (1), 72-83.

Bong, S., Rameezdeen, R., Zuo, J., Li, R. Y., & Ye, G. (2015). The designer’s role in workplace health and safety in the construction industry: post-harmonised regulations in South Australia. International Journal of Construction Management, 15 (4), 276-287.

Dangerfield, B., Green, S., & Austin, S. (2010). Understanding construction competitiveness: the contribution of system dynamics. Construction Innovation , 10 (4), 408-420.

ORDER A CUSTOM-WRITTEN, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Kakitahi, J. M., Alinaitwe, H. M., Landin, A., & Mone, S. J. (2016). Impact of construction-related rework on selected Ugandan public projects. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14 (2), 238-251.

Liberal. (2019). TAFE NSW: health, community services construction workers in need in Dubbo. Retrieved from https://www.dailyliberal.com.au/story/5860410/here-are-the-job-industries-in-dubbo-seeing-growth/

Lingard, H. (2017). Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project. Safety Science, 91, 206-220. Managing the External Environment Assignment.

Loosemore, M., Danity, A., & Lingard, H. (2011). Human Resources Management in Construction Project: Strategic Operational Approaches.

Ngata, A. (2012). Roles of Different Stakeholders in the Construction Industry.

Powell, A., Meltzer, A., Martin, C., Stone, W., Liu, E., Flanagan, K., et al. (2019). The Construction of Social Housing Pathways Across Australia. Melbourne: AHURI Final Report No. 316, Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute Limited.

Queensland Building and Construction Commission. (2019). Standards and Tolerance Guide.

Rastogi, N., & Trivedi, M. K. (2016). PESTLE TECHNIQUE – A TOOL TO IDENTIFY EXTERNAL RISKS IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3 (1), 384-386.

Sabet, P. P., Aadal, H., Jamshidi, M. M., & Rad, K. G. (2013). Application of Domino Theory to Justify and Prevent AccidentOccurance in Construction Sites. Mech. Civ. Eng, 6 (2), 72-76.

SAI-Global. (2011). Guide to Standards -Building and Construction.

Shane, J. S., Molenaar, K. R., Anderson, S., & Schexnayder, C. (2009). Construction Project Cost Escalation Factors. Journal of Management in Engineering, 25 (4), 58-89.

Weaver, D. A. (2006). Symptoms of Operational error. Professional Safety, 51 (4), 48-54. Managing the External Environment Assignment.